After the automation transformation of domestic explosion-proof junction box production lines, the production efficiency has generally increased by 40% -80%, depending on the degree of automation integration, existing production line bottlenecks, and product specifications and characteristics.
1, Efficiency improvement intervals for different levels of transformation (1) Semi automated transformation (only replacing manual high-intensity processes such as feeding, locking, and labeling)
Efficiency improvement: 40% -55%
Adaptation scenario: The original production line has a high degree of standardization in the process, and single variety batch production (II) is fully automated (including automatic assembly, explosion-proof testing, appearance testing, and packaging)
Efficiency improvement: 65% -80%
Adaptation scenario: Fixed category production with stable product specifications and a monthly production scale of ≥ 10000 pieces
2, Boundary limitations for efficiency improvement
In scenarios where product specifications frequently switch between multiple varieties and small batches, the improvement rate is about 40% -50%, and flexible tooling is required
Before the renovation, there were already core processes waiting for the production line (such as delayed testing), and the improvement rate may be as low as 25% -35%
The manual assembly pace has reached the industry's best old factory, with an increase of about 35% -45%
3, Key Efficiency Comparison Data
Manual single shift (8 hours) single workstation production capacity: approximately 300-500 pieces
Fully automated workstation single shift production capacity: approximately 1800-2500 pieces
The efficiency of automatic explosion-proof detection is 6-8 times that of manual testing
