The efficiency improvement of industrial oil removal production lines after automation transformation usually ranges from 40% to 85%, depending on the manual dependence, process matching, and equipment cycle redundancy of the production line before the transformation, and there is no unified fixed value. 1, The influencing conditions of the core improvement amplitude
Degree of manual substitution: Before the transformation, the production line with all manual operations (including manual feeding, flipping of workpieces, and manual adjustment of oil removal parameters) had an efficiency improvement of 65% to 85%; Only locally assisted manual production lines can improve by 40% to 60%.
Process adaptability: During the renovation, specialized automation equipment (robotic arms, conveyor lines, PLC control systems) that matches existing oil removal processes (spray, ultrasonic, immersion, etc.) are used, resulting in a 55% to 85% improvement in conflict free scenarios; Scenarios that require adjusting process parameters are increased by 40% to 55%.
Beat optimization space: Before the renovation, there were idle production lines with equipment idling and workstations waiting. After automation connection, the efficiency was increased by an additional 10% to 15%. 2, Efficiency fluctuations in boundary scenarios
Small batch multi variety workpieces: When paired with flexible automation fixtures, the improvement range is 40%~50%; If quick replacement of fixtures is required, it will compress the space by up to 45%.
Processes containing hazardous chemicals: must comply with GB 3836 explosion-proof standards and closed safety interlock requirements, with no additional efficiency loss and improvement within the above range.
The oil removal process with extremely high precision requirements (such as aviation components): Automation transformation requires the addition of visual inspection, reducing the improvement by about 5% to 10%, while still maintaining over 45%.
